Sound Bite
Taking a quizzical, philosophical look at the conundrums life places before us, the author explores paradoxical situations in philosophical dialogues geared to stimulate thought and resonate with the reader's own experiences. Implications regarding politics and politicians, leadership and democracy are investigated along the way.
About the Author
Nick Pappas has published a series of over 20 thought-provoking books with Algora Publishing, examining ways to handle personal challenges, how to think about our relationships to each other and how to decide our own path in life, how to choose what we do and why, and how to get the most out of everyday life.
Nick teaches high school English Language Arts in Western New York. Prior to that he worked as a director and consultant in information technology. He is a graduate of the University of Chicago and Harvard Law School. Nick has written numerous short stories and poems in addition to his philosophical dialogues.
|
About the Book
In a style emulating that of the Platonic dialogue, the author approaches serious moral questions in a conversational manner that will appeal to both the general and the specialized reader.The first dialogue, 'Controvert, Or on the Lie,'...
In a style emulating that of the Platonic dialogue, the author approaches serious moral questions in a conversational manner that will appeal to both the general and the specialized reader.The first dialogue, 'Controvert, Or on the Lie,' examines the nature of lies and telling 'the truth' and tests our assumptions regarding whether or when it might be appropriate to lie. Is it right to lie just for fun? Is a lie justified when speaking to a tyrant?'Contempt' ponders many distinctions we assume exist but which we may not have considered very carefully, including those between what is good and what is contemptible, and shades of nuance between pity, love, and respect, and hate and fear. Can contempt be the key element of a fighting creed? Or is contempt itself contemptible?In 'Ambition,' the characters debate the nature of this very human characteristic, its value as a passionate love of life that enables us to reach for the stars and its darker side as a destructive, self-centered drive to win adulation and assert our own good over that of others. Is ambition more than the love of praise? Must ambition be harnessed (and to what end?) or is it more powerful when left unchecked and allowed to flower into great accomplishments? The world of human aspirations and the means by which we pursue them are explored further in the dialogues 'Architect,' 'Brilliance,' and 'Anarchy.' Using these specific threads the author weaves together a consideration of larger questions as well, including the inevitable competition between individual and society, and how to approach life for the maximum value.
|
More . . .
VirtueDirector: Cheer up! Is it so clear that the two are divorced?Author: The character of the virtue of the heart changes when the virtue of the mind begins to flourish. Director: How?Author: It attaches more to the individual than the group. Director: Is this how you see it, Student?Student: Yes. Brilliance undermines the order that sustains it. Director: Hmm. But does the order sustain brilliance or stifle it? Author: True ' brilliance struggles against order in order to free itself....
VirtueDirector: Cheer up! Is it so clear that the two are divorced?Author: The character of the virtue of the heart changes when the virtue of the mind begins to flourish. Director: How?Author: It attaches more to the individual than the group. Director: Is this how you see it, Student?Student: Yes. Brilliance undermines the order that sustains it. Director: Hmm. But does the order sustain brilliance or stifle it? Author: True ' brilliance struggles against order in order to free itself. Director: Because that order does not sustain its heart?Student: Yes!Author: No. Because the development of the virtue of mind is the highest end of man and worthwhile for its own sake. It's not some sort of second-best compensation.Director: But is virtue of the mind possible without virtue of the heart? What? No answer, Author?Student: I think it is. It's evil genius. Director: Let's take a step back. Suppose the virtue of one's heart is fully developed ' one is a Spartan, through and through, fully attached to one's people, one's state. Does one feel the need to develop the virtue of the mind? Student: No, one is content. Author: Really, now! It is my turn to be surprised. Did the Spartans not develop the art of generalship, to say nothing of politics, to the highest degree? And did this not take the virtue of the mind?Student: Of course, but it didn't take brilliance ' just hard competence. Director: And this is because brilliance is more flash than substance. Student: Precisely. Director: Author, I recall having read an article about your latest book which declares you brilliant. Now, please, don't show false modesty when you answer. Do you think your work shows more flash than substance? Author: I think my work shows a considerable bit of substance. Director: More substance than flash?Author: There is not all that much substance in this world, Director, that it can predominate easily over the flash. But that substance is worth more by itself than all the flash there ever was, or will be, put together. Director: And the articulation of this substance is the work of hard competence. Author: Of course it is. Director: And is your heart in your work or are you, forgive me, an evil genius who writes with a completely cold head?Author: You know better, Director. A clear head is a cold head ' but it is sustained by a warm, if not hot, heart. Director: So the evil genius that Student mentioned is a cold head coupled with a cold heart. Author: I think that's a fair description. Director: Then is that our definition of brilliance, the effect of which is a work that more resembles a diamond than a portrait?
|
Book News
Drawing on an academic background in literature and law, Pappas has written fiction, nonfiction, poetry, and some 400 philosophic dialogues. The title dialogue of this book is a conversation involving Extrovert, Introvert, Critic, and Director. Others dialogues pertain to contempt, architect, brilliance, ambition, and anarchy. He does not introduce, reference, or provide an index to the 12 dialogues presented here, intending that they stand alone and speak for themselves.
(Annotation ©2009 Book News Inc. Portland, OR)
|
|
Pages 188
Year: 2008
LC Classification: BJ1421.P37
Dewey code: 177'.3--dc22
BISAC: PHI005000 PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy
BISAC: PHI011000 PHILOSOPHY / Logic
BISAC: PHI001000 PHILOSOPHY / Aesthetics
Soft Cover
ISBN: 978-0-87586-651-2
Price: USD 21.95
Hard Cover
ISBN: 978-0-87586-652-9
Price: USD 31.95
eBook
ISBN: 978-0-87586-653-6
Price: USD 31.95
|